Saturday, April 29, 2006
April 28 2006
Global bonds dropped 0.9 percent in March and 0.7 percent in April, thus yielding the worst returns in two years, when the markets were getting ready for the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise interest rates. A total of two thirds of all local and government bonds posted negative absolute returns this year. The decrease in interest rates was felt across the board: Lehman Brother’s U.S. Aggregate Bond index fell 1.2 percent year to date, Pan-Europe index fell 2.7 percent, and Asia-Pacific fell 1.3 percent year to date.
Recently, yields posted a series of four year highs in expectation of a quarter-point rate rise in May and another rise to 5.25 percent by June. Unfortunately, on Thursday, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke hinted at a looming pause in rate rises. Speculators argued about whether the pause in interest rate rises was truly a pause or an end; those arguing that interest rate rises were nearing an end were in fact correct. Some “traders are betting that rate-sensitive, short-dated yields will fall faster than longer-dated ones because they believe it will become clearer that the next move in rates will be down.”
Internationally, in Germany, Bund yields reached 4.033 percent, the first time in 18 months that it reached above 4 percent. “With eurozone inflation pushing back up and eurozone economic confidence surging, the ECB should, in theory, have all the ammunition they would need for a rate hike in May.” The UK market 10 year yields reached a high of 4.72 percent on Thursday, but went down to 4.645 percent on Friday. The fluctuation in interest rates has lead to incredible amounts of speculation regarding the future of international bond rates.
Now foreign companies are seeing a new wave of fakes, with counterfeit enterprises competing in creativity of product line while still capitalizing on the brandname. Excerpt below.
Next step in pirating: Faking a company
By David Lague International Herald Tribune
FRIDAY, APRIL 28, 2006
At first it seemed to be nothing more than a routine, if damaging, case of counterfeiting in a country where faking it has become an industry.
Reports filtering back to the Tokyo headquarters of the Japanese electronics giant NEC in mid-2004 alerted managers that pirated keyboards and recordable CD and DVD discs bearing the company's brand were on sale in retail outlets in Beijing and Hong Kong.
The pirates were faking the entire company.
Evidence seized in raids on 18 factories and warehouses in China and Taiwan over the past year showed that the counterfeiters had set up what amounted to a parallel NEC brand with links to a network of more than 50 electronics factories in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
In the name of NEC, the pirates copied NEC products, and went as far as developing their own range of consumer electronic products - everything from home entertainment centers to MP3 players. They also coordinated manufacturing and distribution, collecting all the proceeds.
The Japanese company even received complaints about products - which were of generally good quality - that they did not make or provide with warranties.
NEC said it was unable to estimate the total value of the pirated goods from these factories, but the company believed the organizers had "profited substantially" from the operation.
"These entities are part of a sophisticated ring, coordinated by two key entities based in Taiwan and Japan, which has attempted to completely assume the NEC brand," said Fujio Okada, the NEC senior vice president and legal division general manager, in written answers to questions.
"Many of these entities are familiar with each other and cooperate with each other to develop, manufacture and sell products utilizing the NEC brand."
Some technology companies have been criticized for piecemeal and half-hearted attempts to protect their intellectual property, but Okada said NEC was prepared to take proactive measures to defend its brand.
NEC had not previously made public the piracy in order not to compromise its investigation.
Records showed that the counterfeiters carried NEC business cards, commissioned product research and development in the company's name and signed production and supply orders.
They also required factories to pay royalties for "licensed" products and issued official-looking warranty and service documents.
Some of the factories that were raided had erected bogus NEC signs and shipped their products packaged in authentic looking boxes and display cases.
NEC said about 50 products were counterfeited, including home entertainment systems, MP3 players, batteries, microphones and DVD players.
Many of these pirated items were not part of the genuine NEC product range.
The investigation also revealed that fake goods from these factories were on sale in Taiwan, mainland China, Hong Kong, Southeast Asia, North Africa, the Middle East and Europe.
In some cases, they were being sold alongside legitimate NEC products in retail outlets.
The counterfeiting attack on the NEC brand comes as the Chinese government is coming under intense international pressure to crack down on rampant intellectual property theft. The U.S. government and American businesses complain that the Chinese efforts to combat piracy have so far been ineffective.
Gregory Shea, president of the U.S. Information Technology Office in Beijing, which represents more than 6,000 technology companies, said it was clear that the top Chinese leaders understood that intellectual property rights contributed to economic growth.
In response to the losses suffered by Japanese companies, Tokyo has called on China to crack down on piracy.
But piracy experts say privately that strained Chinese-Japanese ties complicate Tokyo's efforts to support Japanese companies operating in China.
While intellectual property violations continue, there are clear signs that China is responding to international pressure.
Governments, laws and businesses will have to deal with increasing sophistication of the counterfeiting enterprises with increasingly sophisticated countermeasures. What drugs are known to be in Latin America, counterfeiting will be the equivalent in China.
Friday, April 28, 2006
April 27 2006
Asia is facing a potential unemployment crisis prompted by a slow-down in economic growth which doesn’t seem to be reaching an up-turn any time soon. The pace of job creation has left an unemployment rate of approximately 30 percent, or 500 million people in a region with a total labor force of 1.7 billion. This level of unemployment could lead to “social instability, political strife, policymaking paralysis and capital flight.” If these unemployment issues are not addressed, India, for example, could face a 3 to 4 percent growth within five to six years, as opposed to the current 7 to 8 percent growth.
Newly industrialized economies, such as Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore have succeeded in generating many new jobs which demand high skills but pay high wages. South Asia, on the other hand, has failed in attempts at creating similar new “good jobs.” Approximately 1.9 billion Asians live on less than $2 per day, despite the region’s progress in reducing poverty. In China it getting harder to create jobs, a problem which is not alleviated by the fact that it took an 8 percent growth rate to stimulate a 1 percent increase in employment, as opposed to the much smaller 3 percent growth rate required in the 1980s.
Employment growth rates are especially low in the formal sector, which is more capital intensive and where workers have more defined employment contracts and decent working conditions. Some analysts warn that “Asia’s success will sooner or later be eclipsed by the pressures of a huge ‘reserve army’ of unemployed and underemployed workers who are constantly driven to seek out employment at substandard wages in order to survive.”
1) What effect, if any, does the increasing outsourcing of jobs to Asia have on employment rates?
2) Does the decreasing employment rate in Asia indicate that there is a slow-down in outsourcing in addition to a decrease in domestically-created jobs?
April 28 2006
This Thursday Microsoft’s stock dropped 11 percent to $ 24.25. This fall in market value came shortly after Microsoft announced a new plan to reinvest some of its profits into new markets and into the continuing marketing of its online service search engine, MSN.com. Microsoft, which has been publicly trying to increase the market of MSN.com since last summer, wants to jumpstart its online business, which holds Google and Yahoo as its main competitors. Microsoft also plans to maintain a lead over Sony in the videogame business; Sony plans to introduce a new version of PlayStation later this year.
On a positive note, Microsoft seems to be emerging from a five year period of struggling, which followed a period of immense growth in the 1990s. Wall Street looked forward to a period of steadily rising profits as a result of the upcoming release of Windows Vista, a range of new products, and increasing sales. However, stock prices declined when Microsoft announced its plan to recycle of profits and new increase spending. Microsoft plans to add between $2 and $2.5 billion to its operating costs in the next fiscal year. The increase in spending will be spread across new products, but analysts see this increase as an attempt to catch up with Google and Yahoo in the online search engine business.
Microsoft forecasts an increase in earnings per share of only 8.5 percent, which is half the projected rise of 16 percent. This new change in direction, a.k.a., the increase in spending, was announced by Microsoft’s CFO, Chris Liddell, who added that details would not be available until an analyst’s meeting at the end of July. Overall, Microsoft’s earnings show that the MSN business overall was shrinking and its search advertising business was up only 7 percent, which is far below Google and Yahoo.
1) What does the future hold for MSN.com, given that Google and Yahoo do not show any signs of slowing down in the future?
2) How, at all, will the new product releases, including Microsoft Vista, affect the market for MSN.com?
April 27, 2006
This week, Ukraine memorialized the victims of the 20-year-old Chernobyl nuclear reactor disaster. The destruction of reactor Chernobyl-4 released 400 times more radiation than the Hiroshima atomic bomb, caused approximately 56 direct deaths, and forced the evacuation and resettlement of over 336,000 people. The reactor's explosion even registered as a weak seismic event in Ukraine.
Since the disaster, Ukraine has received almost $1 billion USD in Chernobyl-related aid. Currently, a $768 USD tomb to encapsulate and secure the remaining radiation is being constructed.
The anniversary sparks renewed debate about sustainable energy, the ability of aid programs to respond to disasters, and the prevention of such disasters through incentivizing alternative energy production means.
- UNICEF criticized the Chernobyl responders for not encouraging increased iodine intake for children to prevent thyroid cancer.
- Greenpeace urged relief organizations to admit that the human impact is broader than reported and to acknowledge the potential health-cost crisis.
- Belarussian protesters urged their government to more closely regulate food production to avoid contamination by Chernobyl-effected soil.
For a summary and links to relevant NGO reports, visit Wikipedia's Chernobyl website.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Shell Uses Nigerian Companies Linked to Rebels
By Dino Mahtani and Daniel Balint-Kurti
April 26, 2006
Royal Dutch Shell admitted that it subcontracted work to companies run by Nigerian militant activists involved in a violent insurrection in 2003 that shut down 40 percent of the country’s oil output.
The militant activists are linked to the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (Mend), a rebel group that attacked Shell oil facilities this year, closing down more than a fifth of the output of the world’s eighth largest exporter.
Subcontracting work to local militant groups is one method oil companies have used to “buy-off” militants and avoid attacks on their oil facilities. Contracts are worth an estimated $100,000 per year.
Shell used two companies, Shad-Ro Services and Integrate Production System Surveillance (IPSS), for waste disposal and pipeline security work. These companies have strong political ties to the Federated Niger Delta Ijaw Communities (FNDIC), a militant group that heavily targeted Chevron in 2003.
The Ijaw is the majority tribe in Nigeria’s oil producing Delta region. Many Ijaw leaders say their people have been cheated out of their oil wealth by the government and oil companies while they live in poverty among oil slicks and gas flares. FNDIC have been maintaining pressure on the government to give the Ijaw more political power and access to a greater share of the country’s oil revenue.
Panama Plans Huge Canal Expansion
April 25, 2006
This past Monday, Panama announced its $5.3 billion dollar plan to double the capacity of the Panama Canal. The widening project would allow the Canal to meet growing transit demands by increasing the waterway’s operating capacity and allowing ships of more than twice the present maximum size to use the waterway.
President Martin Torrijos described the project as a “formidable challenge” but necessary if the canal is to retain its place as a key route for global cargo. Due to the increase of exports from China and a new generation of ships that carry twice as much cargo as normal vessels, Panama’s canal has reached capacity.
The project will create several thousand jobs which may win much needed voter support for the initiative. The sentiment that ordinary people have not benefited from the Canal is widespread throughout the country.
The Canal opened in 1914 and was U.S. operated until it was handed over to the Panamanian government through the Torrijos-Carter Treaty of 1999. An estimated 5,609 lives were lost from disease and accidents during the American construction era (1904-1914), though that estimate increases by the thousands if deaths from the French construction era are added.
The Panama Canal is approximately 50 miles long between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The Canal uses a system of locks-compartments with entrance and exit gates. An estimated 13,000 vessels use the Canal every year. Commercial transportation activities through the Canal represent approximately 5% of the world trade. The Canal has a workforce of approximately 9,000 employees and operates 24 hours a day.
"The creation of a water passage across Panama was one of the supreme human achievements of all time, the culmination of a heroic dream of over four hundred years and of more than twenty years of phenomenal effort and sacrifice. The fifty miles between the oceans were among the hardest ever won by human effort and ingenuity, and no statistics on tonnage or tolls can begin to convey the grandeur of what was accomplished. Primarily the canal is an expression of that old and noble desire to bridge the divide, to bring people together. It is a work of civilization.”
– Author David McCullough, A Path Between the Seas
For more information on the Canal, please visit the Panama Canal Authority website.
Friday, April 21, 2006
The Times (London)
April 16, 2006
The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami sparked an outpouring of charitable giving to reestablish services in south and southeast Asia. Now, those funds are stalled while Oxfam and Save the Children investigate corruption claims. These two international aid organizations, based in the U.K., believe contractors hired to build new housing structures in Indonesia have misused funds and completed shoddy structures.
A preliminary investigation by an anticorruption organization reveals that 30-40% of aid funds may have been tainted. Other financial and governmental institutions, including the World Bank, have joined in condemning the small number of entrepreneurs who control these construction firms.
While the investigation continues, many of the projects commenced by these contractors will have to be destroyed and rebuilt properly. Prior to these fraud claims, the total cost of recovery was estimated at $5 billion USD.
Thursday, April 20, 2006
Published: April 17 2006
On Monday, April 17, 2006, South Korea’s trade minister, Kim Hyun-Chong, announced that Seoul and the United States would not enter in to a bilateral trade agreement, even though the two countries set a quick timetable from completing the deal. Perhaps this haste in completing the agreement by a specific deadline caused hesitation on the part of South Korea. Kim has said that he would be more comfortable If there was more time to reach an agreement before the formal negotiations begin on June 5, 2006. This agreement would likely require South Korea to open its car, pharmaceutical and part of its agricultural markets. This seems like a large requirement for South Korea, but Kim says that Seoul does have a minimum bottom line. In order for both countries to receive the necessary domestic approval for this bilateral trade agreement, the overall package much be balanced and consider the concerns of both countries.
On Saturday, 17,000 people protested the deal, arguing that it would increase South Korea’s economic reliance on the United States. South Korea is seeking to exclude rice from the deal, like it is excluded from multilateral trade agreements until 2015. The first part of negotiations begins on June 5th and will conclude in March 2007. The completed deal would then go through the U.S.’s Trade Promotion Authority (which has the power to negotiate trade deals without amendment procedures from the U.S. Congress). This process must be completed before the deal expires in June 2007.
The negotiations will likely be difficult because the U.S. will likely “to push for changes in “grey” areas of non-tariff trade barriers as well as on black-and-white tariffs issues.” Finally, there is friction over products manufactures at the Kaesong industrial park in North Korean because the U.S. is opposed that these products be considered “made in Korea.”
1) Why would the U.S. be opposed to labeling the products made in the North Korean factory, “made in Korea”?
2) What is the likelihood that the United States and Seoul will reach an agreement in a timely fashion regarding the car, pharmaceutical, and agricultural markets?
3) What is the likely outcome of these negotiations? Will they be balanced? How will the South Korean population react to this agreement, if passed?
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
By Krishna Guha and Scheherazade Daneshkhu
April 19, 2006
On Wednesday, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) published its biannual World Economic Outlook (WEO). The WEO presents IMF staff analysis and projections of global economic development.
In the WEO, the IMF pressured for shifts in exchange rates, and called for a significant depreciation of the dollar over the medium term to resolve global economic imbalances. The IMF said it was also essential that currencies of Asian countries and that of oil exporters be allowed to appreciate as part of the “required realignment of exchange rates”. To address global imbalances, exchange rate shifts would need to be accompanied by “rebalancing demand across the world, with steps to increase savings in the U.S., raise consumption in China, and invest in the rest of Asia and boost productivity growth in the region.”
The IMF identified global imbalances as the biggest threat to an otherwise “favorable” economic environment where global growth has exceeded four percent for the fourth year in a row. The IMF sees the U.S. growing at 3.4 percent this year, and raised its forecasts for Japan, China, India, and oil exporters. The IMF also expects consumer price inflation in industrialized nations to remain at 2.3 percent this year.
The World Economic Outlook encouraged consumers to view the current high oil prices as permanent losses, rather than as temporary. The WEO attributed recent increases to the “deepening” fear of short- and long-term supply.
Click here to view the IMF World Economic Outlook: Globalization and Inflation April 2006
By Adam Thompson
April 19, 2006
What started out as an email grassroots initiative has spread from the U.S. to Mexico. Millions of Mexican citizens are threatening to boycott U.S. products and businesses in Mexico in “the Great American Boycott” on May 1st.
The May 1st U.S. protest entitled, “A Day without Immigrants” is aimed against House resolution 4437 and toward obtaining a more comprehensive immigration reform. U.S. protestors hope that a work stoppage will force Congress to recognize the millions of undocumented migrant workers who have become a vital source of cheap labor for the U.S. economy.
One Mexican government official said that Mexican nationals feel so strongly about U.S. immigration reform because of the increasing amount of remittances – money sent home by immigrants in U.S. According to Mexico’s central bank, at more than $20 billion per year, remittances are Mexico’s second-biggest source of foreign currency after oil.
“It is totally the wrong approach because the U.S. business community has been one of the most adamant supporters and lobbyists of a comprehensive immigration bill”– Larry Rubin, head of the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico City
Singapore: Self Replicating
May 23, 2006
In what has to be considered an ingenious solution to its crisis of lack of land,
The author contends that such a 'deal' would make sense for
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
By Benedict Mander
April 17, 2006
Last month, Argentina made its first bond issue directly to international investors since 2001 for $500 million. The country anticipates another $500 million. Previously, Argentina relied on Venezuela and local investors for all of its financing. This year, Argentina has borrowed $1.5 billion at below market interest rates from Venezuela and now feels confident enough to issue at market prices.
Some market analysts believe that Argentina will suffer a "whiplash" when the market changes. “Hold-out” investors who did not enter the restructuring last year still own $20 billion of Argentina’s unpaid debt. These investors prevent Argentina from issuing debt in foreign countries without risking the seizure of the funds. Without a settlement for hold-out investors, Argentina must pay an extra 30-50 basis points on locally issued debt.
Argentina is optimistic that Gross Domestic Product warrants will re-establish its credibility in international capital markets. Argentina is half way to its $4 billion funding requirement for this year. The remainder will come from a World Bank loan and domestic pension funds.
I don’t think Argentina has ever paid a long-term or medium-term bond in accordance with its terms. It is at a decision point: does it want to be a part of the world economy or not? At the moment, Argentina is not a serious country. – Manager of New York hedge fund that owns Argentine sovereign debt
By Krishna Guha
April 18, 2006
As part of its eight-point agenda for economic reform, the Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobbyist organization representing 345 international financial institutions, urged the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to meet with the world’s 11 most economically powerful countries to advocate for policy changes that will reduce global economic imbalance.
Some of the recommendations IIF made included setting target ranges for the most important global currencies, such as the dollar, euro, yen, and Chinese renminbi; exercising caution when these countries lend to emerging markets; and monitoring how each country’s economic policies affect the world’s financial system.
The IIF also organized a committee of experts on emerging market finance to “monitor developments in emerging market lending and its own principles for lender-borrower relations.” The committee is chaired by Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank; Henrique de Campos Meirelles, governor of the Central Bank of Brazil; and Toyoo Gyohten, former Vice-Minister for Finance of Japan.
The IMF’s governing body, the International Monetary and Financial Committee will meet this Saturday in Washington at the IMF’s annual spring meeting.
Federal Reserve policy-makers meeting on March 27-28 felt the U.S. central bank was nearly done raising interest rates but remained worried about potential inflation risks.
"Most members thought the end of the tightening process was likely to be near, and some expressed concerns about the dangers of tightening too much, given the lags in the effects of policy," said the minutes from the policy-setting meeting, the first under new Chairman Ben Bernanke.
The minutes from the meeting, at which policy-makers raised interest rates for a 15th time since mid-2004, were released on Tuesday.
Monday, April 17, 2006
By Humphrey Hawksley
BBC Newsnight, Sao Paulo
April 3, 2006
Earlier this month, assistant Secretary of State Thomas Shannon was dispatched to Beijing to inquire about China's growing influence in Latin America on everything from oil and gas, to defense projects. America has been "protective" of Latin America since 1823, when President James Monroe "decreed that no foreign power would have more influence there than the U.S. itself."
Of great concern are the recent elections in Latin America that have produced a number of leftist countries that are extremely critical of U.S. policy.
"We're concerned about the leftist countries that are dealing with China," says Congressman Dan Burton (R) Chairman of Sub-Committee on the Western Hemisphere, "It's extremely important that we don't let a potential enemy of the U.S. become a dominant force in this part of the world."
China-Brazil business began less than two years ago after a series of meetings between Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva and Chinese President Hu Jintao. Since then, there has been a heavy influence of Chinese culture in Brazil, including the Mandarin language and other Chinese cultural habits. China asserts that it has much to teach Brazil regarding building economic development and decreasing poverty.
April 17, 2006
Analysts in Mexico believe that the upcoming Presidential election will be the closest in Mexican history. The leading candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (leftwing candidate for the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD)), who used to hold a large lead, now holds a lead of only four points against Felipe Calderón, candidate for the Center-Right National Action Party (PAN). Calderón holds 34% of the vote, which is a 2% increase from only a month ago. Roberto Madrazo, candidate for the Revolutionary Institutional party (PRI), is a distant third with 25% of the vote.
As López Obrador’s lead becomes smaller and smaller, Mexico’s business and community and investors are enthralled because they view Calderón as a much stronger candidate. Calderón promises to open Mexico’s energy sector to private investors, make labor laws more flexible, and crack down on crime. On the other hand, López Obrador promises to cut salaries and perks of top government officials in order to fund more comprehensive social spending.
Some pollsters believe that López Obrador’s quick fall is due in part to very effective negative campaigning by Calderón’s team. Some advertisements link López Obrador to economic chaos and to Hugo Chávez, the radical Venezuelan president. Other analysts believe that this fall is due to López Obrador’s derogatory comments about President Vincente Fox. Mexican citizens place great importance on institutions, and therefore they reject attacks on the presidency.
On a positive note for López Obrador, his opponents have done the worst they can in terms of negative campaigning. As pollster Dan Lund stated, “López Obrador should be bleeding and on the floor but he is not. An independent poll confirms that he continues to be in the lead.”
Sunday, April 16, 2006
In recent times, Indian politicians have expressed a desire to make remove any encumberances from India's currency, the Rupee. While the Rupee can be coverted freely for trade in goods and services, restrictions are placed on international asset acquisition. India's economy is in great shape for such a transition. Economic growth has averaged a very healthy 7-8% over the past five years, while inflation has remained steady at approximately 4-5%. India's foreign reserves currently stand at 144 billion dollars which would cover approximately 13 months of imports. Furthermore, short term debt as a percentage of total debt is also steadily declining.
Freeing its currency has many advantages for India. To begin with, a free currency would give emerging Indian companies access to foreign debt markets, in addition to decreasing delays in foreign exchange trades. The abolishment of capital controls would allow foreign investors greater access to India's banks and debt markets and might boost foreign investment, which despite substantial improvements, lags far behind China. To sustain its current rate of growth, India's Prime Minister has estimated that India would require approximately 70 billion dollars of foreign investment, something that could be realized with the help of a free currency. Moreover, a freely floating currency would remove the last remaining obstacle to India's integration with global markets, and would be "a reflection of the nation's increased self-confidence."
China's economy grew 10.2% the first quarter of 2006 buoyed by strong export growth and resurgent bank lending. China had a trade surplus of 23 billion dollars in the first quarter and its foreign reserves rose by 56 billion dollars. This rapid pace of growth because of increasing export demand is likely to lead to further calls from the United States for China to appreciate its currency. Last year China de-pegged its currency, the Renminbi from the US dollar allowing a one-time appreciation of 2.1 per cent. The currency has since appreciated by approximately 1.1 per cent against the US dollar.
The robust growth is not impressing many however. In fact, critics point that China continues to rely heavily on foreign investment and heavy industrialization, which is considered undesirable and unsustainable by many. In response to these critics, the Chinese Government is clearly recognizing objectives other than rapid economic growth. In its next 5 year plan, the Government has envisaged a growth rate of 'just' 7.5%, with the focus being on energy efficiency and environmental awareness during this time.
Revenue from oil is providing the fertile ground for dispute between the government in Chad and the World Bank.
Chad is one of the poorest in the world. About 80 percent of its 7 million people live on less than $1 a day in this landlocked country in Central Africa. Like many others in the continent, Chad is trading on oil to increase GDP growth and development. The current project causing the dispute is the pipeline from Chad through Cameroon, built to transport the oil for export at the Atlantic Coast.
Total project costs were estimated at $4.1 billion. While the private sector sponsored most of the costs in this project, the World Bank has provided loans of $39.5 million to Chad as well. The condition of this World Bank loan is poverty reduction, to be monitored by Chad's churches, trade unions and non-governmental organisations.
Last December the Chadian government changed a law that carefully controlled how oil revenues were spent. Chad wanted to use $36m of revenues held in a fund that is meant to tackle poverty to deal instead with the country's financial problems, against the World Bank's warning. In response, the Bank froze all payments of oil revenues to the government, amounting to $100m. Failing negotiations, the Chadian government is issuing an ultimatum now, threatening that if the Bank does not turn over the revenue by noon on Tuesday next week, the pipeline will be shut down.
If the flow of oil is stopped, profits enjoyed by oil companies in the United States, namely Exxon Mobil, will dry up along with the pipeline.
The Chadian government accuses the World Bank of colonizing the country by imposing policy goals on money earned with the country's own natural resources. This controversy illustrates a classic problem in development economics, that in receipt of aid from the developed world, developing countries have to give up significant control over its national policies, implicating national sovereignty.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
April 13, 2006
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development:
The U.K.-based European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("EBRD") provides financing to former Soviet States to encourage new investment and full transition to market economies. The EBRD, founded in 1991, operates in twenty-seven countries and has a capital base of 20 billion Euro.
This week, the EBRD, working cooperatively with AzeriGazBank, agreed to loan $2 million for the promotion of small and mid-size businesses in Azerbaijan. One goal of the EBRD loan is to stimulate job growth in the country. As of 2002, 49% of Azerbaijan citizens lived below the poverty line. As of 2005, the country's unemployment rate hovered at 1.2% for a labor force of 5.45 million people. Refer to the CIA Factbook for more information about Azerbaijan's chief industries.
The EBRD is often subject to the same criticisms as other large international lenders. Critics often request that the Bank reconsider certain policy initiatives and better ensure the effective use of money offered on credit. For a summary of some of these general concerns, review the UICIFD E-Book, Part II, Section 2.
April 12, 2006
The author discusses how women are the "world's most under-utilized resource" and a key to economic development and growth. In support of his argument, the author states that women consistently get better grades than men, are more likely to go to university and financially savvier than men. Thus, according to the author, women are better equipped to excel in the workforce than men.
The author exhorts governments to "exploit" women’s abilities. In the author's opinion, investing in female education in developing countries would deliver enormous economic and social returns for two reasons. First, educated women are likelier to be more productive than men, and second, they are likelier to raise well-educated and healthier children. The author suggests that increased representation of women in government will probably lead to a shift in priorities away from "tanks and bombs" to issues such as improving health, education and infrastructure.
April 12, 2006
AU Ministers in Nairobi for WTO Talks
April 12, 2006
In an effort to keep the WTO Doha trade talks moving, in light of a looming 2007 deadline, the U.S. Trade Representative has appealed to African countries to unite and more aggressively lobby for their preferred trade outcome. Negotiations between the U.S., E.U., and Brazil over agricultural and manufacturing trade provisions have led to a stalemate. This tactic may be an attempt to revitalize the discussion.
"[Deputy U.S.T.R.] Bhatia said African nations needed to appreciate what they stood to gain from a successful conclusion to the Doha round -- greater market access, greater security of access to the developed country market and most importantly, greater access between developing country markets, where tariffs are highest."
African Union members are in Nairobi discussing numerous trade related issues, including a bilateral agreement with China, the progress of WTO negotiations, and pending aid agreements.
Some critics argue that the bilateral agreements, like the one referenced above, will continue to be utilized even if the Doha negotiations successfully lead to a global trade agreement. To force an outcome would be unnecessary or counterproductive.
"[I]t does not follow that the U.S. appetite for bilaterals will be appeased if developing countries hasten to capitulate to terms of a Doha round from which only very few are expected to benefit, once the costs of tariff revenue loss and market entry facilitation are taken into account. The U.S. has negotiated and will continue to negotiate bilaterals with or without the conclusion of the Doha round. . . . Doha is in the doldrums because the Doha agenda is too large for WTO members to agree on in a way that can be implemented fairly, thoroughly and transparently."
Refer to "Forced Conclusion of Doha Agenda Is No Way to Go" for the full critique.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Excerpt from: Taipei calls for tourism and flights deals with Beijing
Financial Times, April 12, 2006
Taiwan on Wednesday called for a deal with China within six months on tourism and non-stop charter flights as its independence-minded government sought to pre-empt weekend talks between the opposition Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist leadership.
“We demand China complete negotiations with us within six months on admitting Chinese tourists to Taiwan and on regular passenger and cargo charter flights,” said Joseph Wu, the head of the cabinet-level China policy body.
Mr Wu added that Taipei’s move was aimed at clearing up “the misunderstanding that China is handing out goodwill all the time and we are blocking all the time.”
Delegates mandated by the government have been in contact with Chinese counterparts over potential deals on tourism and regular direct flights since last summer.
Taiwan had committed itself last year to letting up to 1,000 Chinese citizens in once it and Beijing have readied a regulatory framework. Taiwan also proposed a long time ago that regular cross-Strait charter flights for passengers and cargo should be established, with up to one flight a day on the cargo side.
China is more eager to see frequent passenger flights because it believes that increased contacts will make the Taiwanese people feel more positive about eventual unification, while Taiwan views cargo flights as more important because they are commercially attractive to its transport industry.
Officials said it is likely that charter flights will start this year, with more frequent one-off deals, and will then be gradually expanded into scheduled charter flights.
Chinese and Taiwanese airlines have offered one-off non-stop charter flights over Chinese New Year before. Such events are likely to occur more often now over the Dragonboat Festival and the Mid-Autumn festival, officials said. Separately, one-off cargo charter flights could be organized.
Taipei also hopes to expand the scope of cargo flights under any eventual agreement to nearly double the level of its earlier proposal.
It is known that Taiwan investment in China accounts for as much as half of all FDI in China. The economic gains from trade with China is something that the pro-independence camp in Taiwan have not overlooked at all. As the above report shows, there are times when Taiwan officials would like to claim credits for fostering stronger economic ties with China--as it is generally believed in Taiwan that it will help growth in domestic economy.
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
UPDATE 3-Wal-Mart defends bank bid, draws fire from critics By Kristin Roberts, Washington(Reuters)
Wal-Mart Bank Opposed by Bankers, Consumer Groups (Update5) By Lauren Coleman-Lochner, New York
Wal-Mart has applied to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for insurance for a proposed bank in Utah, one of the few states that allows commercial firms to operate banks.
Meanwhile, Utah is reviewing Wal-Mart's application for a bank charter. A coalition of labor unions, community groups, small bankers and other Wal-Mart critics has been urging the FDIC to hold hearings around the country before deciding the merits of Wal-Mart's application, and to compel Wal-Mart to disclose more information on how its new enterprise would affect local economies.
The small bankers also worry that the Wal-Mart bank, though based in Utah, could begin operating chapters in other states, threatening local lending institutions nationwide. And they worry about mixing commerce and banking.
The hearings in Arlington, Virginia, are the first the agency has ever held on an application. More than two dozen consumer groups and bankers are testifying that the company's reputation for wiping out competitors and its poor track record as a corporate citizen should convince the FDIC to reject Wal-Mart. The company's past attempts to operate banks in California, Oklahoma and Toronto have all been rejected by government regulators.
Labor and community groups have pointed out that given Wal-Mart's history of breaking labor and sex discrimination laws, there is little reason to think that Wal-Mart would obey banking laws.
Community advocates like ACORN are particularly troubled that Wal-Mart is trying to exempt its Utah bank from the Community Reinvestment Act, which requires financial institutions to make credit available in the low- and moderate-income communities in which they operate, and has sometimes been a genuine impetus to economic development in poor neighborhoods.
WTO Sees Global Trade Growth Quickening in 2006 Geneva(Reuters)
Earlier this week the World Trade Organization (WTO) said that global trade may grow 7 percent in 2006, up slightly from 6 percent last year, but warned the outlook was uncertain.
Among downside risks is the possibility that U.S. economic growth could slow more than expected because of higher real interest rates and energy costs, it warned.
The International Monetary Fund voiced similar warnings this week. In its latest Global Financial Stability Report the IMF said that major cyclical risks that lay ahead for financial markets stemmed from higher interest rates and/or higher inflation, worsening credit quality of various debtors and a sudden unwinding of global imbalances. On house prices, it said U.S. housing market activity appeared to have slowed recently in response to higher interest rates in the world's largest economy, where the Federal Reserve raised borrowing costs for the 15th straight time last month.
But while there were concerns higher rates would raise households' debt servicing burdens and softer prices could curb consumption, the Fund noted "prospects of a soft landing" judging from trends in Britain and Australia's housing markets.
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
So what's the nexus between the African countries and China?
Energy resources have become a viable trade item in the continent. Sudan, Nigeria, Angola, and Congo have traded with China on oil. Equatorial Guinea and Gabon are also oil traders. Africa currently contributes 12 percent of the world's liquid hydrocarbon production, and one in four barrels of oil discovered outside of the U.S. and Canada between 2000 and 2004 came from Africa.
Indeed, it has been reported that Angola has surpassed Saudi Arabia as the number one supplier of oil to China. Angola shipped 456,000 barrels a day to China in the first two months of the year.
If readers remember the CNOOC bid for UNOCAL last year that caused outcries in the United States--well, now CNOOC and other Chinese oil companies have found new courtships with African countries. Sinopec agreed last week to help build a $3bn refinery in Angola. In January, CNOOC agreed to pay $2,27bn for a stake in a Nigerian oil field. Companies from the U.S and India have also made significant investments in the region, hoping to assuage the current oil shortage and diversify reliance on suppliers in the Middle East.
In return for oil, China often offers development aid to its oil trading partners. A report by the Council of Foreign Relation has noted that, "In Angola, which currently exports 25 percent of its oil production to China, Beijing has secured a major stake in future oil production with a $2 billion package of loans and aid that includes funds for Chinese companies to build railroads, schools, roads, hospitals, bridges, and offices; lay a fiber-optic network; and train Angolan telecommunications workers."
Fifteen percent of U.S. oil imports come from Africa; by 2010 this could reach 20 percent.
Investment in Africa does not go without risks. Conflict situations, political instability, organized crimes and terrorism complicate the flow of free trade. Factors external to the African countries may also affect foreign policies. China's continuous courtship with the oil countries in Africa presents larger issues such as China's general tolerance toward authoritarian regimes, the involvement of arms trade as exchange for oil, and human rights violations that China often ignores.
Monday, April 03, 2006
Long merely a blip on Canada's financial services scene, Canadian Western Bank is bearing the fruit of close ties to the Alberta oil boom, and showing the Toronto-based big boys how to leverage low-risk growth from a strong economy.
Based in Edmonton, Alberta, CWB was once a stock market laggard. But it now commands a far better valuation than Canada's most profitable lenders, and plans to use its newfound wealth to add to its small but lucrative insurance business.
The bank, Canada's eighth-largest, makes its home far from the traditional banking centers of Toronto and Montreal. But its location has been crucial to success and has brought a lucrative franchise providing commercial loans to small-to-mid sized companies in Alberta, the new sweet spot of Canada's economy. "We serve the construction industry, the forestry industry, oil and gas, transportation, all those sorts of things that most of the other banks really ignore," Chief Executive Larry Pollock, said in a recent interview.
The bank's growth has prompted some analysts to reconsider the stock. "I've been wrong on the story now for quite a long time, and it was because when you take a look at Canadian Western Bank as a bank, its valuation does not make any sense whatsoever," said National Bank Financial analyst John Aiken, who rates the bank sector perform with a target of C$43 a share. "The problem is that we as Canadian investors are not used to seeing a bank growing at the same rate that CWB has been growing at on an extended period of time."
Intel is working on a durable, low-cost personal computer aimed at developing nations. The plan is to connect the computers to the internet using wireless protocols. The computers are specialized to withstand dust and heat, and to operate on a fluctuating power supply.
"Based on several pilot projects conducted throughout India, Intel sees the Community PC as most attractive to villagers seeking a registry for government paperwork they would otherwise have to travel extensively to retrieve and file."