The Economist, October 13th, 2005
"In search of elusive domestic demand"
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5025883
The author suggests that exports remain the primary driver of economic growth in south-east Asia, and domestic demand continues to remain stagnant. For example, exports stood at 168% of Singapore's GDP last year. The author seems to believe that for economic growth to be truly sustainable, it must, at least in part, be driven by domestic demand.
Is this a valid assumption? Is the author's belief that international trade is “fickle,” inaccurate? Finally, if international trade is fickle, why might domestic demand not be so?
Monday, October 17, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment